Homeowners insurance in Florida, one row expanded
What a full page looks like when a row is not enough.
Reference table, fifty-one jurisdictions
A state is not a place in this product. It is a regulator with a filing desk, a rate that was approved or was not, and a body of statute deciding what may be asked of you — so a home insurance by state table can hold those three things and very little else.
| State | Premium band HO-3, 2023 | Insurer of last resort 2018–2022 | What that plan covers | Storm deductible June 2025 | Rate approval Fall 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Fourth fifth | Coastal wind plan only | Wind, hail and hurricane only | Yes | Prior approval |
| Alaska | Second fifth | None | Not in the federal table | Not specifically regulated | Flex band |
| Arizona | Lowest fifth | None | Not in the federal table | Not specifically regulated | Use-and-file |
| Arkansas | Fourth fifth | None | Not in the federal table | Not specifically regulated | File-and-use |
| California | Middle fifth | FAIR plan | Fire, lightning, windstorm and hail | Not specifically regulated | Prior approval |
| Colorado | Highest fifth | FAIR plan, created 2023 | Created 2023, after the federal window | Not specifically regulated | File-and-use |
| Connecticut | Highest fifth | FAIR plan | Fire, lightning, wind and hail | Yes | File-and-use |
| Delaware | Lowest fifth | FAIR plan | Fire, lightning, windstorm and hail | Yes | File-and-use |
| District of Columbia | Middle fifth | FAIR plan | Named perils | Yes | File-and-use |
| Florida | Highest fifth | FAIR plan | Named or multi-peril; wind-only in 35 coastal counties | Yes | File-and-use |
| Georgia | Fourth fifth | FAIR plan | Fire, lightning, wind and hail | Yes | File-and-use |
| Hawaii | Middle fifth | FAIR plan | Named or multi-peril | Yes | Prior approval |
| Idaho | Lowest fifth | None | Not in the federal table | Not specifically regulated | Use-and-file |
| Illinois | Second fifth | FAIR plan | Named or multi-peril | Not specifically regulated | Use-and-file |
| Indiana | Second fifth | FAIR plan | Named or multi-peril | Not specifically regulated | File-and-use |
| Iowa | Second fifth | FAIR plan | Fire and lightning; named perils on HO-8 | Not specifically regulated | Use-and-file |
| Kansas | Fourth fifth | FAIR plan | Fire and lightning only | Not specifically regulated | File-and-use |
| Kentucky | Middle fifth | FAIR plan | Named or multi-peril | Not specifically regulated | Use-and-file |
| Louisiana | Highest fifth | FAIR plan | Wind and hail on dwelling forms; named or multi-peril otherwise | Yes | Prior approval |
| Maine | Lowest fifth | None | Not in the federal table | Yes | File-and-use |
| Maryland | Middle fifth | FAIR plan | Named or multi-peril | Yes | Prior approval |
| Massachusetts | Highest fifth | FAIR plan | Named or multi-peril | Yes | File-and-use |
| Michigan | Lowest fifth | FAIR plan | Named or multi-peril | Not specifically regulated | File-and-use |
| Minnesota | Fourth fifth | FAIR plan | Named or multi-peril | Not specifically regulated | File-and-use |
| Mississippi | Highest fifth | FAIR plan + coastal wind plan | FAIR plan: fire and lightning. Beach plan: windstorm and hail only | Yes | Prior approval |
| Missouri | Middle fifth | FAIR plan | Fire, lightning, windstorm and hail | Not specifically regulated | Use-and-file |
| Montana | Fourth fifth | None | Not in the federal table | Not specifically regulated | File-and-use |
| Nebraska | Highest fifth | None | Not in the federal table | Not specifically regulated | File-and-use |
| Nevada | Lowest fifth | None | Not in the federal table | Not specifically regulated | File-and-use |
| New Hampshire | Second fifth | None | Not in the federal table | Not specifically regulated | File-and-use |
| New Jersey | Middle fifth | FAIR plan | Fire, lightning, windstorm and hail | Yes | Prior approval |
| New Mexico | Second fifth | FAIR plan | Fire, lightning, windstorm and hail | Not specifically regulated | File-and-use |
| New York | Fourth fifth | FAIR plan | Fire, lightning, windstorm and hail; DP-2 adds ice and snow weight | Yes | Prior approval |
| North Carolina | Fourth fifth | FAIR plan + coastal wind plan | FAIR plan: named or multi-peril inland. Beach plan: wind and hail only | Yes | Prior approval |
| North Dakota | Second fifth | None | Not in the federal table | Not specifically regulated | Prior approval |
| Ohio | Lowest fifth | FAIR plan | Named or multi-peril | Not specifically regulated | File-and-use |
| Oklahoma | Highest fifth | None | Not in the federal table | Not specifically regulated | Use-and-file |
| Oregon | Lowest fifth | FAIR plan | Fire and lightning; wind and hail by endorsement | Not specifically regulated | File-and-use |
| Pennsylvania | Second fifth | FAIR plan | Fire and lightning; wind and hail by endorsement | Yes | Prior approval |
| Rhode Island | Highest fifth | FAIR plan | Named or multi-peril | Yes | File-and-use |
| South Carolina | Fourth fifth | Coastal wind plan only | Wind and hail only | Yes | Prior approval |
| South Dakota | Middle fifth | None | Not in the federal table | Not specifically regulated | File-and-use |
| Tennessee | Middle fifth | None | Not in the federal table | Not specifically regulated | Prior approval |
| Texas | Highest fifth | FAIR plan + coastal wind plan | FAIR plan: fire and lightning. Beach plan: wind and hail, 14 gulf counties | Yes | File-and-use |
| Utah | Lowest fifth | None | Not in the federal table | Not specifically regulated | Use-and-file |
| Vermont | Second fifth | None | Not in the federal table | Not specifically regulated | Use-and-file |
| Virginia | Middle fifth | FAIR plan | Fire, lightning, wind and hail | Yes | File-and-use |
| Washington | Second fifth | FAIR plan | Fire and lightning; wind and hail by endorsement | Not specifically regulated | Prior approval |
| West Virginia | Lowest fifth | FAIR plan | Fire, lightning, wind and hail | Not specifically regulated | Prior approval |
| Wisconsin | Lowest fifth | FAIR plan | Named or multi-peril | Not specifically regulated | Use-and-file |
| Wyoming | Fourth fifth | None | Not in the federal table | Not specifically regulated | Open rating |
Three things is not a small number. A regulator either clears a rate before it can be charged or reviews it afterward; a state either has an insurer of last resort or it does not; a hurricane deductible either has a regulated regime behind it or is left to the contract. Each carries its own date, and the dates are not the same date. The premium column is different in kind, and the two columns that are absent are worth more than the four that are here.
The ordering comes from the association of state insurance regulators, in the edition of its homeowners report titled Data for 2023, published July 2026. It uses the HO-3 form, which carried close to 79 percent of owner-occupied homeowners exposures countrywide in 2023. The band is a quintile: jurisdictions sorted by their HO-3 average and cut into fifths. The sorting is ours; the averages under it are not.
It is a weaker measurement than a dollar sign suggests. Hold the country fixed, hold the form at HO-3, and change only the amount of insurance: on 2023 data the average at the largest band runs about four and a half times the average at the smallest. One form, one year, one country, and that spread comes from nothing but the size of the houses. Most pairs of states differ by less.
Two appendices of a Treasury report carry this: one names the state mechanisms, the other what each plan covers. Across 2018 to 2022, twenty-nine rows are FAIR plans, two are coastal wind plans alone, and three states run both. That window is why Colorado reads as it does: created by statute in 2023, with the report's own footnote saying it was not expected to issue policies until 2025.
Nineteen states and the District of Columbia had some form of hurricane or named-storm deductible in place as of June 2025. The blank reads not specifically regulated rather than no, because the source says in its next breath that other states may allow insurers to include one anyway. The triggers differ too: a storm categorized as a hurricane for one, any named tropical system for the other.
Five named regimes, from a federal report published January 2025 resting on an association compilation of Fall 2022: prior approval, file-and-use, use-and-file, flex band, open rating. A 2022 vintage would be indefensible in a premium column and is tolerable here, because a rate regime changes by statute rather than by market.
The copyright page bars reproducing any part of the premium report, in any form or by any means, without written permission, and a fifty-one row dollar column is a reproduction of that table. The report's own objection is the better one: premium is set by the amount of insurance bought, the property and perils covered, and the limits and deductibles chosen, and the average folds all of it into a quotient that cannot be unfolded.
This one is public domain, machine-readable and unusable. The federal workbook behind it records 25,593 ZIP Codes a year from 2018 through 2022, with no state field and no policy counts, so every state figure is somebody's own unweighted aggregation.
Then there is Texas. All 7,550 Texas rows in that 2018 to 2022 file carry a literal zero in the non-renewal field and the two cancellation fields beside it, because Texas insurers did not report those items, while claim frequency, severity and loss ratio in the same rows are populated normally. A zero is not a blank. It averages, it sorts, it renders. Compute state figures without knowing that and Texas comes out first in the country for lowest non-renewal, the reverse of what those years did. The published report drops Texas from its own map and arithmetic. The spreadsheet does not.
Florida has the same defect and no footnote anywhere. Between a quarter and a half of its ZIP-year records carry zero non-renewal, and the state lands fifth from the bottom for the exact span of its market upheaval. The cause sits in the workbook's disclaimer: the collection excludes residual market plans and surplus lines insurers. In Florida the non-renewed policies moved into Citizens Property Insurance Corporation, a state-created insurer of last resort outside the collection, so the file measures the voluntary market after the departures and calls the remainder calm.
Credit-based insurance scoring is the obvious seventh column, and it is a paragraph here because the restriction is drafted per line of business. A state can bar credit history in automobile insurance and permit it on the dwelling, so a one-word cell would answer a question that has two answers. Commercial summaries make that mistake and disagree with one another by more than double.
The regulators' own topic page names no state at all. It says only that in most states these scores cannot be the sole reason to raise a rate or to deny, cancel or refuse to renew. Where a state goes further, its statute says so in words scoped to this line: Maryland's code, at 27-501(e-2)(2), opens “With respect to homeowner’s insurance” and then forbids refusing to underwrite, canceling, refusing to renew, or rating on credit history.
What a full page looks like when a row is not enough.
Comparing states compares house sizes, not tariffs.
FAIR plans, beach plans and the surplus lines market.
Notice periods and deductible types are set locally.
A state-run rate comparison, state-written forms, and a separate windstorm contract.
Two reasons that agree. The body that collects the premium data holds copyright over its report and bars reproduction of any part of it, so the dollar column is not ours to print. The report also calls average premium an imperfect measure of price, because the figure moves with the amount of coverage people bought as much as with what insurers charge.
Yes. The column records whether a state had a regulated hurricane or named-storm regime as of June 2025, and nothing further. The same source says other states may allow insurers to include hurricane deductibles anyway. Your declarations page is the only document that answers this for your own policy.
It decides when the regulator looks, not what the answer is. Prior approval means a filed rate waits for the department before it can be charged; file-and-use means it is charged and reviewed afterward. Florida shows why one word in one cell simplifies: the federal report footnotes it as allowing either method, with excess premium refunded if a use-and-file rate is later disallowed.
Sources and data years
Page last reviewed 2026-09-23. Each figure above carries the year of its own data.